Judge Lori K. Smith No Evidence Courtroom

King County Prosecutors asked the jury pool, “Does anyone believe that there must be evidence prosecuting a crime?” Those who declared yes were sent packing.

Judge Lori K Smith (woman of the year) and Prosecutor Jason Simmons (and gang of 4) fully admited in court that they had no evidence. Indeed, Prosecutor Jason Simmons informed the jury that the State only, repeat “ONLY THING” the state needed to prove was “age.”

…and so it went

King County Prosecutors and Judges Using Liars – so say 5 Federal Judges

[https://consider.info/article/5-federal-judges-king-county-using-liars]

[/video]

 

 


Judge Lori K. Smith and King County Prosecutors claimed it was a trial “without evidence”

…well DUH

…they along with Enumclaw Police, REFUSED, BLOCKED with great hostility to investigate the accusations.

Meanwhile Enumclaw Detective and conspirators were given the green light to set-up a church they were offended by.



Judge Lori K. Smith ruled the following…

In Seattle and King County, that line has been crossed. It is imperative for prosecutor associations, law enforcement, and judges to begin shedding light on these corrupt practices.

The case of State v. Malcolm Fraser, Cause No. 12-1-01886-0, exemplifies a profound instance of corruption that can be built upon for renewed objections in the courts of Washington State.

Seven Irrefutable Facts of the State of Washington. v Malcolm Fraser

  1. The Washington Government hotly refused to investigate clear evidence of a hate crime.

  2. From the outset, Seattle, King County Courts have shielded Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall’s illegal activities.

  3. Despite the abundance of evidence disproving the allegations of sex crimes, an investigation was never pursued. Calls for such an inquiry were systematically blocked.

  4. Seattle, King County Prosecutors misused the law, leveraging Detective Grant McCall and his co-conspirators’ hate crime activities to dismantle a church that stood in opposition to Washington State beliefs. This situation reflects Washington State’s anti-Christian sentiment, contributing to a severe miscarriage of justice through prosecution.

  5. Judge Beth M. Andrus from the very beginning while ruling that Detective Grant McCall had committed “misconduct,” made sure to whitewash McCall’s illegal activities. Judge Beth M. Andrus whitewash ruling without any evidence and zero investigation in the hate crime allowed the legal system to fully corrupt the oppression by future prosecutors and judges.

  6. Judge Lori K. Smith severely corrupted the trial by undermining the defense’s rights and obstructing their ability to mount a vigorous defense. In short, like Detective Grant McCall frame, Judges in Washington State ensured the trial would result in a conviction for prosecutors.

  7. The whole of this trial focused on crushing the rights of a church that Detective Grant McCall and co-conspirator sought to destroy. The sexual allegations were the pretext to permit Washington State to oppress and crush Christianity.

In essence, the trial of Malcolm Fraser should never have occurred. Those implicated in the hate crime should be incarcerated, while those who lied to benefit the prosecution should face charges of perjury.

To this day the evidence supporting these claims is overwhelming and can be found at www.enumclaw.com or www.consider.info.

Post Number

This Post's ID Number Is= 7921

  1. Remember the Post ID Number.
  2. Enter the post number and it will be find.

See Post ID System For List Of Posts