Washington State Stealing Parents Rights

---

WA Democratic lawmakers employ ‘unprecedented power abuse’ to stifle debate and advance bill undermining parental rights

“This issue goes beyond a single piece of legislation. It concerns the significance of the people’s voice. At this moment, House Democrats are ensuring that it is silenced.”

Tensions escalated on Monday as Democrats in the Washington State House of Representatives approved Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5181 (ESSB 5181), a measure that Republicans assert weakens Parental Rights Initiative 2081—adopted only a year ago with considerable legislative support and substantial public approval.

House Republicans voiced their indignation, labeling the action as an “unprecedented abuse of power,” and accused Democrats of employing a newly established rule to stifle debate and suppress minority perspectives—twice within a span of 90 minutes during the bill’s final passage.

“We anticipated this moment, but witnessing it during the Parental Rights initiative, which has the support of nearly half a million voters, is truly disgraceful,” remarked Deputy Republican Leader Rep. Chris Corry (R-Yakima). “House Democrats have rewritten the rules at the start of the session to silence the minority,” he claimed.

The core of the dispute revolves around a procedural rule change initiated by House Democrats earlier this session, which abolished a 132-year-old provision from 1893. This rule had mandated a two-thirds supermajority to terminate debate on bills or amendments. The new guideline permits a simple majority to conclude discussion, greatly enhancing the majority party’s control over legislative proceedings.

Republicans contend that this new authority was exploited to stifle debate on amendments related to the contentious parental rights bill, including one aimed at eliminating the emergency clause—effectively blocking any chance for a public referendum. “The discussion on the amendment focused on whether the people’s voice matters,” said Corry. “House Democrats have made it abundantly clear: they do not trust or value the will of the people.”

House Republican Leader Drew Stokesbary (R-Auburn) delivered a scathing statement, declaring April 14 as “a bleak day for representative governance.”

“Senate Bill 5181 not only undermines Initiative 2081 but also diminishes public trust in our schools and sidelining families at a time when transparency and engagement are paramount,” stated Stokesbary. “Democrats did not have to silence us—they chose to do so. That reveals everything about how much they appreciate the voices of the three million Washingtonians we represent,” he continued.

He added, “By altering the rules and weaponizing them against our caucus, Democrats have created a perilous precedent… They have transformed the People’s House into a mere rubber stamp for those in power.”

Republican Reps. Dan Griffey and Travis Couture from Allyn also voiced their criticism regarding the rule changes, accusing Democrats of dismissing common-sense amendments that possessed broad public support.

Among the proposed amendments that were rejected:

Locker Room and Shower Access: Griffey’s amendment would have mandated schools to provide same-sex locker rooms by default, while accommodating transgender students separately.

Girls’ Sports Protection: A proposal to prohibit biological males from competing in all-girls sports leagues.

Parental Notification: Couture’s amendment aimed to require schools to inform parents if students under 18 could excuse themselves from class without parental consent.

“This issue transcends politics—it concerns fundamental privacy and respect,” stated Griffey. “Students should not be subjected to uncomfortable situations due to agendas pushed by bureaucrats in Olympia.”

Couture characterized his proposal as “a fundamental safety measure,” revealing that a legislative review found that 229 out of 280 school districts in Washington allow minors to excuse themselves without parental notice. “That revelation shocked me—and everyone I’ve spoken to among parents,” Couture remarked. “It’s outrageous. It’s dangerous. It could lead to serious consequences. All we requested was that parents be informed. The Democrats rejected that.”

Despite this legislative defeat, Republican lawmakers assert they will persist in addressing the issue, claiming that House Democrats are disregarding voter intent and compromising transparency.

“This goes beyond one bill,” concluded Griffey. “It’s about the significance of the people’s voice. Currently, House Democrats are ensuring that voice is disregarded.”

---

We knowthat the whole world is under the control of the evil one. 1 John 5:19

---

Because the Washington State Supreme Court continues to Right Rape parents, the Democrats can combine corruption with stealing your rights. The Washington State Supreme Court should have struck down a long time ago the power of Democrats to overtake family and parents.

Keep in mind when you serve on Jury Duty that things should be opposite of what you are witnessing. The right of parents to their children cannot be taken away, except only in cases of extreme abuse.

---

---

The hypocrisy of King County Judge Lori K. Smith and Prosecutor Jason Simmons is staggering. They falsely accused the Sound Doctrine Church of willingly destroying families when the State of Washington is engaged in the wholesale slaughter of the family.  Once again, the prosecutor and Judge viewed me by their wicked hearts. They believe the lie that I am like them.

To the pure, all things are pure, but to those who are corrupted and do not believe, nothing is pure. In fact, both their minds and consciences are corrupted. They claim to know God, but by their actions they deny him. They are detestable, disobedient and unfit for doing anything good. Titus 1:15-16

Right To Happiness

The phrase “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” comes from the United States Declaration of Independence, adopted in 1776. It encapsulates three fundamental rights that the document asserts are inherent to all individuals and that governments are instituted to protect. Here’s a breakdown of their meanings in this context:

• Life: The right to exist and live free from arbitrary deprivation of life. It implies that individuals have a fundamental claim to their own existence, and no authority should unjustly take that away. This includes protections against threats to physical survival and well-being.

• Liberty: The right to freedom, encompassing the ability to act, think, and make choices without oppressive restrictions or coercion. This includes personal autonomy, freedom of speech, religion, movement, and the ability to govern one’s own affairs, provided it doesn’t infringe on others’ rights.

• Pursuit of Happiness: The right to seek personal fulfillment and well-being in one’s own way, as long as it respects the rights of others. This doesn’t guarantee happiness itself but protects the freedom to strive for it—whether through career, relationships, personal growth, or other means that align with individual values.

Historical and Philosophical Context

The phrase was heavily influenced by Enlightenment thinkers, particularly John Locke, who wrote about the natural rights of “life, liberty, and property.” Thomas Jefferson, primary author of the Declaration, adapted this to “pursuit of happiness,” possibly to emphasize a broader, more universal ideal that transcends material wealth and includes personal fulfillment.

• Locke’s Influence: Locke argued that individuals have inalienable rights granted by nature or a creator, which governments must respect. If a government fails to protect these rights, the people have the right to alter or abolish it.
• Enlightenment Ideals: The phrase reflects the Enlightenment’s focus on individual dignity, reason, and self-determination, challenging monarchic or tyrannical rule.
• American Context: In 1776, the phrase was a bold assertion of independence from British rule, justifying the colonies’ break from a government they saw as violating these rights.

Practical Implications

In the Declaration, these rights are described as “unalienable,” meaning they cannot be surrendered or taken away. They form the philosophical foundation for the U.S. government’s purpose: to secure these rights for its citizens. This idea has shaped American law, culture, and debates over issues like free speech, privacy, and equality.

–

Washington State Supreme Court

Justice Debra L. Stephens Justice Charles W. Johnson Justice Barbara Madsen Justice Barbara A. Madsen Justice Steven C. GonzáLez Justice Sheryl Gordon Mccloud Justice Mary I. Yu Justice Raquel Montoya-Lewis Justice G. Helen Whitener Justice Salvador A. Mungia

Derek Stanford – 1st Legislative District Marcus Riccelli – 3rd Legislative District Bill Ramos – 5th Legislative District Bob Hasegawa – 11th Legislative District Adrian Cortes – 18th Legislative District Marko Liias – 21st Legislative District Jessica Bateman – 22nd Legislative District Drew Hansen – 23rd Legislative District Mike Chapman – 24th Legislative District Deb Krishnadasan – 26th Legislative District Yasmin Trudeau – 27th Legislative District T’wina Nobles – 28th Legislative District Steve Conway – 29th Legislative District Claire Wilson – 30th Legislative District Jesse Salomon – 32nd Legislative District Tina Orwall – 33rd Legislative District Emily Alvarado – 34th Legislative District Noel Frame – 36th Legislative District Rebecca Saldaña – 37th Legislative District June Robinson – 38th Legislative District Liz Lovelett – 40th Legislative District Lisa Wellman – 41st Legislative District Sharon Shewmake – 42nd Legislative District Jamie Pedersen – 43rd Legislative District John Lovick – 44th Legislative District Manka Dhingra – 45th Legislative District Javier Valdez – 46th Legislative District Claudia Kauffman – 47th Legislative District Vandana Slatter – 48th Legislative District Annette Cleveland – 49th Legislative District

More Information

WA Dem lawmakers use ‘unprecedented abuse of power’ to shut down debate, pass bill to gut parental rights

Disclaimer

Post Number

This Post's ID Number Is= 16531

1. Remember the Post ID Number.
2. Enter the post number and it will be find.

See Post ID System For List Of Posts